AccessibilityChecker.org vs Complience.app
AccessibilityChecker.org (ACE) is a domain-licensed accessibility platform with a deep crawl, AI-assisted snippet fixes, and a conformance certificate. Complience.app is a site-based axe-core checker plus cookie evidence and a client-ready PDF. They overlap on “paste a URL,” then diverge. See where both sit in the best website accessibility checkers in 2026.
ACE vs Complience.app at a glance
| Criterion | ACE | Complience.app |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Per domain (Lite about $89/month) | Free public scan. Pro account for 20 sites. |
| Crawl depth | Tens to hundreds of URLs on one domain | Plan cap; deeper after origin verify |
| Remediation | SmartFix snippet after approval | Source-only; copy a prompt for your editor |
| Certificate | Vendor certificate product | No. PDF says it is not a legal stamp |
| Cookies | Not the pre-consent pack | Cookies and pixels before Accept |
| Best for | One large property plus snippet fixes | Several small sites and a retainer PDF |
What is the difference between ACE and Complience.app?
ACE licenses a domain, crawls deeper, and sells SmartFix plus a certificate. Complience.app bills by sites, uses axe-core, and records cookies before Accept. After the FTC’s accessiBe order ($1 million over allegedly deceptive WCAG-compliance claims), buyers should ask what any “certificate” actually attests. Ours attests nothing legal. It lists what the machine saw on that date.
Where ACE is stronger
Deep single-domain crawls (tens to hundreds of URLs), a Chrome extension for interactive flows, SmartFix suggestions applied through a JavaScript snippet after you approve them, auto-updating statements, and a certificate product. If you operate one large property and want that stack, stay on ACE.
Where Complience.app is stronger
Price for agencies: the public scan is free, and Pro is a free account for 20 sites. ACE Lite is $89 per domain. We capture marketing cookies and third-party requests before any Accept click, in the same report as axe-core. The PDF can carry a client label on Pro. Every report says it is not a legal certificate.
SmartFix versus source-only
ACE SmartFix injects approved remediations through a lightweight script. Their help center describes that delivery as overlay-like, with human approval. Complience.app does not inject a snippet. We show the failing selector, a screenshot when we can crop it, and a prompt you can paste into Cursor or ChatGPT so a person changes the source.
Who should stay on ACE
Teams that need 100–500 URLs on one domain, password-protected or SPA flows via an extension, a LiveStatement that updates from scans, or a vendor certificate. That is a different job than a retainer PDF and cookie evidence.
Who should switch
Agencies monitoring several client homepages, owners who already know WAVE and want a recrawl plus cookies, and buyers who do not want a JS remediation layer or a “you are compliant” stamp.
When to keep both
Keep ACE if you need the deep single-domain crawl or the certificate product. Add Complience.app if you also need pre-consent cookies and a PDF that refuses a legal stamp. They are not substitutes. Five ACE Lite domains run about $445/month. The Complience.app scan is free, and Pro keeps 20 sites on a free account. Neither product is a cookie banner.
Other comparisons
Questions
Check a public URL
Free scan, up to 25 pages and a branded PDF. No account. A Pro account saves the site and schedules the next run.
