Skip to main content

AccessibilityChecker.org vs Complience.app

AccessibilityChecker.org (ACE) is a domain-licensed accessibility platform with a deep crawl, AI-assisted snippet fixes, and a conformance certificate. Complience.app is a site-based axe-core checker plus cookie evidence and a client-ready PDF. They overlap on “paste a URL,” then diverge.

ACE vs Complience.app at a glance

ACE vs Complience.app at a glance
CriterionACEComplience.app
PricingPer domain (Lite about $89/month)Per sites ($29/month for 5 on Standard)
Crawl depthTens to hundreds of URLs on one domainPlan cap; deeper after origin verify
RemediationSmartFix snippet after approvalSource-only; copy a prompt for your editor
CertificateVendor certificate productNo. PDF says it is not a legal stamp
CookiesNot the pre-consent packCookies and pixels before Accept
Best forOne large property plus snippet fixesSeveral small sites and a retainer PDF

What is the difference between ACE and Complience.app?

ACE licenses a domain, crawls deeper, and sells SmartFix plus a certificate. Complience.app bills by sites, uses axe-core, and records cookies before Accept. After the FTC’s accessiBe order ($1 million over allegedly deceptive WCAG-compliance claims), buyers should ask what any “certificate” actually attests. Ours attests nothing legal. It lists what the machine saw on that date.

Where ACE is stronger

Deep single-domain crawls (tens to hundreds of URLs), a Chrome extension for interactive flows, SmartFix suggestions applied through a JavaScript snippet after you approve them, auto-updating statements, and a certificate product. If you operate one large property and want that stack, stay on ACE.

Where Complience.app is stronger

Price for agencies: Standard is $29/month for 5 sites. ACE Lite is $89 per domain. We capture marketing cookies and third-party requests before any Accept click, in the same report as axe-core. The PDF can carry a client label on Pro. Every report says it is not a legal certificate.

SmartFix versus source-only

ACE SmartFix injects approved remediations through a lightweight script. Their help center describes that delivery as overlay-like, with human approval. Complience.app does not inject a snippet. We show the failing selector, a screenshot when we can crop it, and a prompt you can paste into Cursor or ChatGPT so a person changes the source.

Who should stay on ACE

Teams that need 100–500 URLs on one domain, password-protected or SPA flows via an extension, a LiveStatement that updates from scans, or a vendor certificate. That is a different job than a retainer PDF and cookie evidence.

Who should switch

Agencies monitoring several client homepages, owners who already know WAVE and want a recrawl plus cookies, and buyers who do not want a JS remediation layer or a “you are compliant” stamp.

When to keep both

Keep ACE if you need the deep single-domain crawl or the certificate product. Add Complience.app if you also need pre-consent cookies and a PDF that refuses a legal stamp. They are not substitutes. Five ACE Lite domains run about $445/month. Complience.app Standard is $29/month for 5 sites. Neither product is a cookie banner.

Other comparisons

Questions

Check a public URL

Homepage teaser. Sign in for PDF, history, and a schedule. The 7-day trial does not require a credit card.